Showing newest posts with label illegal downloads. Show older posts
Showing newest posts with label illegal downloads. Show older posts

Illegal movie downloads in France

The number of illegal movie downloads in France is set to overtake box office ticket sales if trends continue. Figures published by the anti piracy bodies Thomson and Advestigo indicate that a massive 450,000 illegal movie downloads take place every day.

The director general of l'Association de Lutte Contre la Piraterie Audiovisuelle , Fr�d�ric Delacroix, said: ?This is a major phenomenon which could put the whole cinema and audiovisual industry in danger.?

He said that France was one of the worst offenders for illegal movie downloads. ?The number of subscribers to fast broadband connections is directly proportional to the trend of illegal downloads. These fast lines enable people to make big downloads like films.?

French movie producers Gaumont have employed the anti-piracy bodies Thomson and Advestigo to monitor illegal download traffic.

According to this study more than 10 million copies of films are downloaded each month; 14.1 million in June and a peak of 16.6 last December. The figures are pushing past the number of people who pay to see films in cinemas ? 12 million in May.

In the first six months of the year they remained below with 62 million illegal downloads compared to 90 million cinema tickets sold. Most films downloaded are American (66%) with France in second position (19%).

The most popular film for pirates at the moment is Bienvenue chez les Ch'tis a surprise box office smash which pulled in 20 million viewers at the cinema.

Illegal downloaders to get warning letter in government clampdown

Internet service providers have struck a deal with government and the music industry to help clamp down on illegal downloading.

The deal, to be announced later today, is thought to include an agreement for ISPs to send out hundreds of thousands of letters to account holders responsible for illegal downloading.

The memorandum of understanding, struck with the BPI, the body that represents record labels, and the government, will be announced today ahead of the launch of a consultation on the introduction of legislation to clampdown on offending.

The memorandum of understanding has been struck with the UK's six biggest ISPs - BT, Virgin, Carphone Warehouse, Orange, Tiscali and BSkyB - and includes a deal for all parties to work together to develop ways to deal with repeat offenders.

The agreement has been reached ahead of an announcement expected later today by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform of a consultation on regulatory options to punish ISPs if they fail to take action against the illegal downloading of music, films and TV programmes.

"We have looked to ISPs to acknowledge their responsibility to help deal with illegal filesharing, engage in communicating the issue to their customers, and put in place procedures necessary to effectively tackle repeated unlawful filesharing," said a spokesman for the BPI.

"Achieving this would represent a significant step forward and demonstrate clearly the collective will that exists to tackle this serious issue."

It is thought that BSkyB's announcement of a digital music joint venture with Universal Music earlier this week - the venture has no name, no pricing and no launch date - could have been a move to prove that ISPs are supporting new, innovative, legal digital models ahead of the announcements today.

In February, the culture secretary, Andy Burnham, raised the possibility of introducing legislation to crack down of illegal filesharing as part of a wide-ranging strategy paper designed to look at ways of supporting the UK creative industries and digital intellectual property.

At the time Burnham said that the government preferred to find "voluntary, preferably commercial, solutions" but that it would look to introduce legislation next April if necessary.

The strong stance by the government has alarmed ISPs, which believe that regulation is a step too far.

Trackback URL

Airport scans for illegal downloads on iPods, mobile phones and laptops


Ipods, mobile phones and laptops could be examined by airport customs officials for illegal downloads under strict new counterfeiting measures being considered by G8 governments this week, it is claimed.

The measures form part of an international agreement aimed at stamping out piracy, but there are fears that individuals who have illegally downloaded songs or video clips on to MP3 players and phones for personal use could also be caught out.

They coincide with plans by the European Parliament for Internet Service Providers to be held liable if their users download illegal content, and in extreme cases, forced to disconnect people who are doing so.

Illegal downloading and piracy represents the biggest single problem faced by the music, film and publishing industries, and many have been lobbying governments to introduce tough new rules to help stamp out the practice.

Earlier this month, Virgin Media resorting to writing to customers warning them that their internet services would be terminated if they persisted in file sharing. So far, little has been revealed about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement being considered by the G8 nations, apart from a mention in the organisation's "Declaration on the World Economy" published this week.

Backing the development of the new agreement, it said: "Effective promotion and protection of Intellectual Property Rights are critical to the development of creative products, technologies and economies."

A leak to a technology website revealed that the focus of Acta was "border measures, particularly how to deal with large-scale intellectual property infringements, which can frequently involve criminal elements".

However, a footnote saying that those signing up to Acta should put in place "provisions related to criminal enforcement and border measures to be applied at least in cases of trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy", has generated intense speculation about what it could mean for the individual.

Recent research by the British Music Rights group found that the average teenager and student has 800 illegal downloads on their MP3 player. The suggestion that the new laws could be used by customs to scan MP3 players, mobiles and laptops for illegal downloads is just one of a number of potential measures that is causing concern in the technology world, leading to fevered debate about the implications on a number of websites.

Another is that mobile phone companies could contact their customers to warn them off sharing video clips. However, a source representing record labels said the practice of checking iPods and phones was unworkable.

"It is more likely to be about customs having the powers to intercept large shipments of raw materials and vast packages of MP3s with prerecorded content," he said.

Hollywood wants $15 million from Pirate Bay Downloads

Hollywood wants $15.4 million in damages for copyright infringement from the people behind The Pirate Bay, according to a claim filed by industry organization the Motion Picture Association.

Pirate Bay is one of the most widely used BitTorrent trackers for music, movies and software. Previously the recording industry, computer game developers and local movie companies, have specified damages totalling $15.4 million dollars.

Included in the claim are "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "The Pink Panther," "Syriana," "Walk the Line," and 13 episodes from the first season of "Prison Break."

"The Pink Panther" is the most popular title among Pirate Bay users; the least popular, by a mile, is "Syriana." They have been downloaded 49,593 and 3,679 times, respectively, according to MAQS, the law firm which represents MPA.

The damages are based onper downloaded movie and every time someone had downloaded a copy of Prison Break. The sums are not unreasonable, because the distributed files didn't include copy protection, and were made available before the release of a DVD or a legal download, according to MAQS.

Included in the final sum is also interest, which will continue to grow, and damages for the harm Pirate Bay has caused.

Illegal downloads in Japan will be punished

Companies in Japan plan to cut off the Internet connection of anyone who illegally downloads files in one of the world's toughest measures against online piracy.

Faced with mounting complaints from the music, movie and video-game industries, four associations representing Japan's Internet service providers have agreed to take drastic action, the Yomiuri Shimbun said.

The newspaper, quoting unnamed sources, said service providers would send e-mails to people who repeatedly made illegal copies and terminate their connections if they did not stop.

The Internet companies will set up a panel next month involving groups representing copyright holders to draft the new guidelines, the report said.

Company and government officials could not immediately be reached for comment on the report Saturday. The actions would be among the strictest in fighting online piracy.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy late last year outlined similar measures to disconnect Internet users who flagrantly violated copyright laws. But for the most part, illegal downloading is being addressed through litigation against individuals.

The music industry won a first-of-a-kind victory in a US court in October when a single mother in Minnesota was ordered to pay more than 220,000 dollars for sharing 24 songs online. The Yomiuri Shimbun estimated that 1.75 million people in Japan use file-sharing software, mostly to swap illegal copies.

One Internet service provider considered two years ago a plan to disconnect people who swap illegal files but dropped the plan after the government said it may violate the right to privacy, the Yomiuri said.

The best-known Japanese file-sharing software is called Winny, which allows users to swap games, movies and music online. It was developed by Isamu Kaneko, a young research assistant at the prestigious University of Tokyo who has become an Internet icon. But in 2006 he was fined 1.5 million yen (15,000 dollars), although he was spared jail.

Trackback URL

Illegal downloaders 'face UK ban'

People in the UK who go online and illegally download music and films may have their internet access cut under plans the government is considering.

A draft consultation suggests internet service providers would be required to take action over users who access pirated material via their accounts.

But the government is stressing that plans are at an early stage and it is still working on final proposals.

Six million people a year are estimated to download files illegally in the UK.

Music and film companies say that the illegal downloads cost them millions of pounds in lost revenues.

The government proposals were first reported by the Times newspaper.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said that early drafts of the document had been circulated among stakeholders.

"The content and proposals for the strategy have been significantly developed since then and a comprehensive plan to bolster the UK's creative industries will be published shortly," it added.

"We will not comment on the content of the leaked document."

Voluntary scheme

The Times suggested that broadband firms which failed to enforce the rules could be prosecuted, and the details of customers suspected of making illegal downloads made available to the courts.

According to the Times, the draft paper states: "We will move to legislate to require internet service providers to take action on illegal file sharing."

Some of the UK's biggest internet providers, such as BT, Virgin and Tiscali have been in talks with the entertainment industry over introducing a voluntary scheme for policing pirate activity, but no agreement has been reached.

So far, they have failed to resolve how disputed allegations would be arbitrated - for example, when customers claim other people have been "piggybacking" on their internet service.

'No liability'

Technology that allows internet providers to monitor what content is being downloaded is becoming more effective, said James Bates, media director at consultants Deloitte.

"This is also likely to help accelerate the process of identifying pirates, and may lead to swifter disconnection, or prosecution," Mr Bates said.

However, the Internet Service Providers Association said data protection laws would prevent providers from looking at the content of information sent over their networks.

"ISPs are no more able to inspect and filter every single packet passing across their network than the Post Office is able to open every envelope," the association said.

"ISPs bear no liability for illegal file sharing as the content is not hosted on their servers," it added.

The BPI, the trade body that represents the UK record industry, said internet providers had "done little or nothing to address illegal downloading via their networks".

"This is the number one issue for the creative industries in the digital age, and the government's willingness to tackle it should be applauded," said BPI chief executive Geoff Taylor.

"Now is not the time for ISPs to hide behind bogus privacy arguments, or claim the problem is too complicated or difficult to tackle."

Sourced from BBC

Pirates to outfox movie studios

"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it," a famous person once said, though I forget who. Or from whom he probably stole the phrase. But it's a maxim Hollywood might do well to bear in mind as, to a karmic backdrop of Thomas Edison's hollow laughter echoing from beyond the grave, it continues to grapple with the seemingly intractable conundrum of movie piracy, and how to capitalise on the public's burgeoning demand for movie downloads.

But what specific history did I have in mind at the beginning of that paragraph, you might be asking? Well, let's go back to the early 1890s and things should become clearer. Not least, that piracy in the movie industry is hardly something new. In fact, it's something the studios have been profiting from for over a century.

Back in the 1890s, founded on Prohibitionist values, ironically enough, Hollywood was no more than a recently developed residential community. It boasted 320 days a year of sun, and by 1903 enough prosperity to become incorporated. However, thanks to all that sun, it couldn't boast nearly enough water, prompting it's annexation to Los Angeles in 1910. It certainly wasn't yet known for movies.

In fact, the origins of Hollywood as we know it today are actually to be found in the East of America: in New Jersey. It was there that, in Thomas Edison's labs, William Dickson invented the Kinetoscope; and where, in 1893, Edison set up Black Maria, the world's first film studio.

Now, all-round bright spark and seasoned inventor that he was, Edison of course patented his assistant's new moving-picture making device, and set about profiting from it by distributing short films to penny arcades, vaudeville theatres, and fairgrounds. But it was only after the Lumiere brothers' 1895 invention of the Cinematographe system, in France, that movies came to be projected on screens and viewable by more than one person at a time.

Realising the Cinamatographe's potential, Edison and others quickly came up with their own versions, and by 1908, the movie business was booming; mass-produced 15-minute shorts being shown in thousands of movie theatres all across America.

Edison, though, was having trouble enforcing his patents. Even as early as 1898, fearing that other people were profiting from "his" invention, he had begun issuing lawsuits to rival movie producers.

Following a series of fruitless legal battles against, among others, American Mutoscope and Biograph, actually co-founded by William Dickson, and by then a more successful company than Edison's own, Edison changed tactics. In late 1908, banding together with Biograph, and a selection of other patent holders and producers, Edison formed the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC), a Trust issuing licenses for use of its members' technology, enforcing its members' patents, and generally attempting to regulate the still nascent motion picture industry. It worked well; at first. But there was still much resistance. Enter William Fox (of what would become 20th Century-Fox).

Hollywood's history has featured many a famous pirate: from Jack Sparrow, to the swashbuckling Errol Flynn, to, erm, whoever it was Geena Davis played in that film that killed her career. So it could perhaps be seen as fitting that Hollywood as we know it today was founded by pirates; independent filmmakers, operating outside the licenses of, and profiting from technology owned by the MPPC.

One of the best methods the independents found of escaping Edison's reaches was to relocate to the other side of the country, where, thanks to California's relaxed laws, and what was then still the necessity of shooting in daylight, Hollywood and its 320 days of sunshine proved the ideal movie-making location. Within two decades, Louis B Mayer, the Warner Family, Samuel Goldwyn, and William Fox had all arrived there.

In 1911, in an attempt to finally break the MPPC's hold over the industry, Fox took the Trust to court. While Fox, in fact, lost his lawsuit, the judge nonetheless found that the MPPC constituted an illegal monopoly in restraint of trade. Various cases and six years later, the MPPC was finally disbanded by order of the American Supreme Court. One band of innovators had given way to another.

Nearly a century later we come to today's pirates: they too may be determining the future of Hollywood; or at the very least forcing it to adapt to the 21st Century.

Granted, there is little doubt that offering copyrighted movies for download is illegal; but, in doing so, quite so successfully, today's movie pirates have pointed out an inefficiency in the market, a desire that is not being met. Undoubtedly some people will always want something for nothing, and will always find ways to get it, but what the public has responded to, primarily, is the convenience offered by pirate movie downloads. While Hollywood's moguls have been snoozing complacently, the market has been changing. The pirates have been responding to its customers' dissatisfactions.

Cinema-goers are fed up of over-inflated ticket prices. People hate waiting months to rent or buy the next big film, or to see it outside of America. Rental shops often don't have what you want, and aren't open 24-hours. Many people balk at spending �15 on a DVD that might not be that great (and let's face it, much that Hollywood has produced lately hasn't been). And what about all those brilliant obscure and back-catalogue films that are so hard to get your hands on? All these deficiencies in Hollywood's current distribution methods, the pirates have responded to: pretty much whatever you want, there's a stream or a torrent for it somewhere. Plus, you can watch it in your own home, at your own convenience.

On the other hand:

You never know for sure whether you'll get a good quality picture, or something grainy recorded from the middle row of a multiplex with people's heads in the way. Downloads can take forever, or never complete. Watching on a computer isn't always that great. And there's always the slight unease that goes hand-in-hand with illegality.

All of which, and more, is where Hollywood should be sensing opportunity. Provide a legal, practical, reliable, convenient alternative to what the pirates are offering - essentially just no-frills movie downloads, film downloads, video downloads, call them what you will - and the majority of people would be more than happy to use the service.

For the most part, of course, Hollywood has instead responded to piracy with all lawyers blazing. There are promising signs emerging, though, that it is at least beginning to adapt to the new competition: studio-backed film download sites, such as Vizumi, NetFlix, and Amazon Unbox, are on the increase. Heck, even BitTorrent offers legal movie downloads these days. The recent news of Apple?s plans for movie downloads will send shock waves across the industry. Can they repeat the same success of iTunes with iMovies only time will tell?

Now, if the studios could just sort out some Digital Rights Management technologies that don't treat it's download customers like criminals, they might actually be on to a winner.

79% of Americans download movies illegally

79% of Americans who are downloading movies do so illegally despite access to subscription based services.

US consumers are still downloading movies illegally despite the growing availability of subscription based movie download services according to a study conducted by Advanis Inc. Subscription based movie downloads have grown in prevalence with companies like Apple Inc., CinemaNow, MovieLink and most recently Wal-Mart offering movie downloads for a fee.

Yet 79% of those downloading movies are still doing so illegally, according to the study and is estimated to be costing the industry $598 million.

"The industry can respond to this stubborn core of piracy in one of two ways," said Phil Dwyer, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Advanis. "It can spend its time and resources pursuing the pirates, and attempting to get them to change their ways, or it can put those same resources into accelerating the adoption of these services by the early mainstream consumers, who are more inclined to behave legally."

"The experience of the music industry, and the evidence of our research suggests there is a hardcore of illegal downloaders who are unlikely to change their behavior. The industry would be better advised to focus resources on migrating new, and legally inclined consumers on to these services."

Downloaders Look For Deals

Despite the convenience of the movie download services, consumers are unwilling to pay a premium for them. In fact, online movie addicts, on average, value downloads at $2.59, while they value a movie bought in a store at more than double that - $5.98.

About this study

Findings are based on a survey of 506 online Americans, fielded between February 5th and 6th, 2007. Estimates are accurate to within +/- 4.6%, 19 times out of 20.